“Decisions That Stick: Clarity, Courage, Conviction”
"Conviction is the difference between trying something and following through to completion."
Most teams don’t lack ideas; they lack sequence. We jump into action or chase consensus before we’ve named the bet, which creates half-commitments, polite hedging, and “pilot purgatory.”
What if your next decision had to be crystal clear in just 30 minutes? Here’s how you can make it happen through clarity → courage → conviction.
Clarity comes first. In one sentence, clearly state the purpose of the decision: We will [achieve X] for [who] by [when], with success measured by [metric].
Include the real constraints—money, time, talent, brand. Present three genuine options, including doing nothing. If you cannot come up with three substantially different choices, you’re not really deciding—you’re just seeking permission.
With clarity, you earn the right to exercise courage. Courage in team leadership isn’t about giving heroic speeches; it’s about the discipline to say no to good ideas so a great one can thrive. Create a kill list—projects to drop or pause—to direct attention and resources toward the best options. Identify the top risks and the first experiment to reduce each one, and assign a single owner.
Once you’ve made the courageous choice to say no to good ideas, you can strengthen your conviction. Share a regular cadence—such as a weekly scorecard plus a short narrative. Set pre-commit exit conditions—what would cause you to stop, extend, or scale? Conviction is the difference between trying something and following through to completion.
Example: Cut internal meeting time:
Clarity
- Goal: Reduce weekly internal meeting time from 7 to 4 hours by November 30, as measured by people’s calendars.
- Constraints: No new software; client calls stay; team across three time zones.
- Options: (A) Halve all recurring meetings. (B) Move status updates to a one-page written update; keep only decision meetings. (C) Do nothing.
- Criteria: Hours saved, number of blocked decisions, ease of reversing the change.
Courage
- Kill list: Cancel the Monday stand-up and Thursday status update; keep ad-hoc decision huddles only when needed.
- Top risks: People miss updates; some feel left out; decisions slow down.
- First experiment (2 weeks): Everyone posts a one-page daily update; questions go to a shared channel; schedule a 15-minute huddle if a decision is blocked for >24 hours.
- Owner: Operations lead.
What if you paused two good projects this week so one great one could breathe?
Conviction
- Learning window: 4 weeks.
- Cadence: 15-minute Friday review of (1) hours saved, (2) number of blocked decisions, (3) team stress score (1–5).
- Exit conditions:
- Stop and reschedule a meeting if two or more decisions are blocked for over 48 hours twice in a week.
- Extend if internal meeting hours drop ≥30% with neutral/positive feedback.
- Scale if hours drop ≥40% and team stress stays ≤3.
Your next move (30-minute 3C huddle this week)
- Clarity (10 min): Write the one-line goal, list constraints, create three options, and agree on criteria.
- Courage (10 min): Make the kill list, name top risks, define the first experiment, and assign an owner.
- Conviction (10 min): Set the learning window and cadence, pre-commit exit conditions, and note the next irreversible checkpoint.
Publish the decision stack as your single source of truth. When objections arise—and they will—route them to the criteria, the risks, or the exit conditions. Don’t reopen the choice unless the exits trigger.
Closing Thought
Leaders often ask for buy-in. Try this instead: buy clarity. Courage and conviction will follow.
What’s one decision you’re struggling with right now? What does a “3C huddle” look like?
Let’s unlock better—together.
Leave a Reply